Monday 13 February 2017

Is suffering incompatible with a higher purpose?

If it's considered that suffering is incompatible with some higher purpose to our existence, then what would the world have to be like so that it is compatible with some higher purpose? Perhaps if no one ever experienced any pain; not just physical but mental pain too? And no one ever experienced misery, least of all depression? Indeed, that our lives are in a constant state of maximum happiness?

And what would such happiness consist in? Pleasures? Or the feeling like you had as a child when you woke up on a Christmas day morning? Or if you were in a permanent state of a certain type of intellectual satisfaction?

Obviously that's silly. But perhaps people mean there's too much suffering -- not that we shouldn't have any suffering at all. But how do we work out how much suffering would be compatible with some higher purpose?

I think arguably suffering, pain, anguish, despair, loss of a loved one etc, could conceivably be held to be compatible with some higher purpose. For much of history, mankind lived a life full of dangers with the constant threat of death, and suffering, and loss. Close brushes with death from predators with the consequent comradeship and camaraderie when others save your life, and you theirs. The collective outpouring of emotions, the bitter and sweet taste of life in the raw.

In the modern west we are cosseted from all the harsh elements of life. I'll probably die an old man rather than get eaten by a predator. But perhaps, safe and rich as we are, the modern western way of life loses something. It loses the sheer rapture of being alive. If we never experience any dangers, then the sheer thrill of having overcome dangers is also lacking.

So it's not clear to me that suffering is necessarily incompatible with some higher purpose. The problem here is we don't know what the purpose of life is! Hence I think it's impossible to answer such a question.

Maybe it is, but until we know what the purpose of life is, why we are here, how can we say what the nature of our lives should be like?

3 comments:

  1. I see no point to life. What's to like about being a 9 to 5 slave every day in some crappy job just to keep a roof over my head while I gradually turn into some old wrinkly man? I wish I'd been consulted before being brought into this world as there's no way I would have agreed to this crap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you might find 2 blog entries in my other blog relevant here:

      http://ianwardells.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/that-which-is-inimical-to-our-yearning.html

      http://ianwardells.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/are-you-slave-to-system.html

      I think perhaps the only realistic option is to somehow become self-employed.
      http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/16/if-youre-going-to-quit-a-9-to-5-job-that-doesnt-make-you-happy-this-is-the-way-to-do-it/

      Delete
  2. In a recent interview a woman reveals the meaning of life shown to her after an absolutely real shamanism experience around 8:03

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/psychedelic-drugs-lsd-active-agent-in-magic-mushrooms-to-treat-addiction-depression-anxiety-60-minutes-2019-12-29/

    ReplyDelete

Comments must relate to the blog post or they will not be published. Edit to add: I have no ads on here, and it should be obvious I also don't want people linking to pages selling goods or services. They will not be published.

A Review of "Threshold: terminal lucidity and the border between life and death" by Alexander Batthyány

Preamble The rally, or the last hurrah, which in recent years has been termed terminal lucidity , refers to where a person, typically suffer...

Popular Posts