A member of parliament in the UK has called for the reintroduction of capital punishment. See here. Is this a good idea? Before reaching any conclusions as to the desirability, or otherwise, of capital punishment, we need to be aware of a whole range of issues.
There's the issue of the purpose of executing. Is its purpose to act as a deterrent, or rather is its purpose an appropriate retribution or punishment instead?
Indeed, does it in fact deter? If it does, should we execute people if the net sum of peoples' lives are saved, even if we regard capital punishment as barbaric? Or if it does not deter, at least not significantly, is retribution or punishment enough of a justification for its reintroduction? Regardless of whether the purpose is deterrence or retribution, how does the possibility of executing an innocent person effect our decision here?
What about the cost of keeping them in prison for many years compared to execution?
What about the issue of the ultimate origins of our behaviour? Are we mere meat robots whose behaviour is determined by physical laws rather than our conscious intentions? Even if, in a suitable sense, it is me that determines my behaviour, am I just purely a product of my environment? In other words are we born morally neutral? If physical laws, or the environment, or both, wholly determines our behaviour then why would any punishment be justified?
Alternatively, do we have free will and are we the type of people we are, at least in part, due to an innate component? That is say, do we self-determine to a degree how moral we are even though the environment and genetics plays a large role in influencing our behaviour too?
Who should we execute? Anyone who illegally and with premeditation murders someone else? What about a woman who murders her husband as a result of being beat up by him day after day, year after year? Or murdering anyone who has made your life a living hell? What about murder due to a hopeless all-consuming jealousy?
Is executing, in fact, a greater punishment than spending many years languishing in prison? That also depends on what will actually happen to that person after death.
Mostly philosophical topics, especially pertaining to the philosophy of mind.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why are people so certain there's no soul or an afterlife?
Are we essentially souls and will our souls continue on after we die? Both from a philosophical perspective and by virtue of all the evidenc...
Popular Posts
-
All 29 essays from the 2021 BICS essay contest that have been awarded a prize are now available to download and can be read for free from he...
-
Note: This response is approximately 13,000 words long. I have a shorter version of approximately 5,000 words that I have called A Review ...
-
Introduction This is the first part of an intended series of posts addressing alleged problems with the concept of reincarnation. Perhaps ...
-
The falsifiability criterion was advanced by Karl Popper to demarcate scientific from non-scientific theories. The idea is that if one has...
-
I read the following article two days ago: Can We Explain Near-Death Experiences? The author concludes that, " NDEs are probably caused...
-
At the outset I need to stress that I specifically have in mind the reductive materialism that has prevailed in the West since the birth of ...
-
Consciousness is necessarily causally efficacious It is widely believed by scientists and philosophers, and even the scientifically educa...
-
As a preliminary, I should point out that I haven't watched this series of programmes, nor have I read the book that the series is based...
-
The following essay is essentially an expanded and updated version of a previous blog post I've written called: Why are we all so convi...
-
Introduction: I read the following article: Why Parapsychological Claims Cannot Be True It says: The entire field [of parapsychol...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments must relate to the blog post or they will not be published.