Let's imagine there only existed one planet in the entire Universe, and
it is Earth. Now I would suggest that it would be utterly extraordinary if it just happened to be ideally suited for life. It
would be far far more likely that it would be a planet wholly
devoid of any life.
But, of course, there are at least trillions
of planets in the Universe. The overwhelming majority are likely to be
hostile to life. So why do we happen to live on one suitable for life?
Well, obviously because we couldn't have evolved on any of the planets
hostile to life!
Now, the Earth is ideally suited for life. Hence, even if we knew of the
existence of no other planets, it would be overwhelmingly likely that zillions of other planets must exist.
This is the precise
same argument whereby we infer there must exist zillions of
other Universes, all with random differing values for the constants of nature. In the
overwhelming majority of such Universes' life simply could not arise.
The reason why we live in an incredibly unusual Universe that happens to
permit life is precisely the same reason why we happen to live on a
planet which is ideally suited to life.
The other alternative is
to suppose there is only one Universe. The reason why the physical
constants and properties permit life must be because some outside
influence -- a creator of some description -- constrains the Universe to
be that way.
Obviously scientists prefer the multiverse hypothesis.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Note: This response is approximately 13,000 words long. I have a shorter version of approximately 5,000 words that I have called A Review ...
-
1. Preliminary I recently finished reading The Soul Fallacy by Julien Musolino for the second time, and I thought I'd pen down some of... -
I read an article by Ralph Lewis M.D entitled: Is There Life After Death? The Mind-Body Problem He attacks any possibility of an afterlife....
-
1. Introduction I read this article a couple of weeks ago by a professor of philosophy called John G Messerly. He says: There has b... -
5/11/2019 Edited to add: For an expanded and superior consideration of this issue, see my A Causal Consciousness, Free Will, and Dualism . I...
-
Introduction This is the first part of an intended series of posts addressing alleged problems with the concept of reincarnation. Perhaps ...
-
People ask what's the point of life, what's the point of the Universe, and even if there's an afterlife, what would be the point...
-
1. Introduction Common sense holds that what has been labelled the secondary qualities , such as colours, sounds and odours, exist out there... -
Introduction I want to make it clear at the outset that when I refer to consciousness, I’m primarily thinking about qualia in its br... -
Most people seem to take it for granted that the brain produces consciousness and they surmise this because when the brain is damaged, the p...
There is another possibility: there is only one universe, but if it allows the appearance of living beings, it is because in one of its stages allows the appearance of living beings, by chance.
ReplyDeleteHi Juan,
ReplyDeleteI wouln't consider that to be a realistic possibility.
"Obviously scientists prefer the multiverse hypothesis."
ReplyDeleteThey prefer it because mathematical models attests to it. No amount of math can attest to a creator.
Hi John,
ReplyDeleteYou specifically looked for my blog?
Anyway, mathematics is used to describe the patterns in the Universe. Mathematics cannot conjure up a googolplexian number of other Universes. And even our physical theories can only refer to this Universe with its particular physical properties and laws.